<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Dima Tokar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dtokar.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dtokar.com</link>
	<description>Web Design, Android, Productivity &#38; GTD, Science, Religion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:57:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Should there be buzz around Google Buzz? by <img src='http://www.dtokar.com/wp-content/plugins/rpx/images/google.png'/> Dima</title>
		<link>http://www.dtokar.com/2010/02/should-there-be-buzz-around-google-buzz/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator><img src='http://www.dtokar.com/wp-content/plugins/rpx/images/google.png'/> Dima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtokar.com/?p=340#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Ivan,

Thanks for your input. If we were to overlook Google&#039;s glaring omission of privacy controls in the initial release of Google Buzz (which had negative PR implications for G), it is overall a very convenient social media service and the GMail integration is a big selling point for me as a user.

Dima</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ivan,</p>
<p>Thanks for your input. If we were to overlook Google&#8217;s glaring omission of privacy controls in the initial release of Google Buzz (which had negative PR implications for G), it is overall a very convenient social media service and the GMail integration is a big selling point for me as a user.</p>
<p>Dima</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should there be buzz around Google Buzz? by Ivan Bercovich</title>
		<link>http://www.dtokar.com/2010/02/should-there-be-buzz-around-google-buzz/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Bercovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 06:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtokar.com/?p=340#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Dima,

I agree. Technologies don&#039;t have to be revolutionary in order to disrupt the market. Buzz is somehow much more engaging, usable, and, as it seems, reliable (no whale page) than Twitter--yet, it doesn&#039;t offer anything that Twitter would be unable to produce, should they want to. Also, your point that Google will, presumably, do a better job at reducing the SNR seems to be yet another reason why they are likely to take a big piece of the micro-blogging market share.

-Ivan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dima,</p>
<p>I agree. Technologies don&#8217;t have to be revolutionary in order to disrupt the market. Buzz is somehow much more engaging, usable, and, as it seems, reliable (no whale page) than Twitter&#8211;yet, it doesn&#8217;t offer anything that Twitter would be unable to produce, should they want to. Also, your point that Google will, presumably, do a better job at reducing the SNR seems to be yet another reason why they are likely to take a big piece of the micro-blogging market share.</p>
<p>-Ivan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
